Self-Appointed Halal Monitor Accuses 95-Year-Old Kopitiam Of Selling Pork, The Evidence Was A Noodle Name

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter, or Telegram and WhatsApp channels for the latest stories and updates.

On the afternoon of 7 August 2026, the owner of Nan Yang Coffee Shop opened Facebook and found a post about their own restaurant.

The post, published by a page called Halal inquiry Company direktori, carried a question directed at the people of Segamat.

It pointed to the restaurant’s menu.

It noted the presence of a dish called Mee Pok Sup, and suggested the restaurant was serving pork.

The deletion took place approximately three minutes after publication.

Mee Pok is a flat noodle; the word originates from the Teochew dialect — pok (薄) that means flat.

It appears on menus across Malaysia, Singapore, and southern Thailand.

It has no relation to pork.

The Page, The Post, and The Pattern

Halal inquiry Company direktori describes itself as a halal awareness and company directory page.

At the time of publication, it had 297,000 followers, 3,400 posts, and listed itself as based in Johor Bahru.

It posed a series of rhetorical questions.

It noted that Muslims had been observed eating at the premises, and circled the words Mee Pok on a screenshot of the restaurant’s menu.

The implication was clear enough to generate 481 reactions and 83 shares before the post came down.

On Friday (7 August), the restaurant owner filed a police report at the Segamat police station.

A separate formal complaint was submitted to the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), citing misleading information and reputational damage to a business.

The Page Apologised, It Also Decided Who Could Respond

Several hours after the deletion, Halal inquiry Company direktori published an apology post.

The apology post received 2,000 reactions and 94 shares.

Beneath it, Facebook displayed a notice: “Halal inquiry Company direktori limited who can comment on this post.”

The original accusation post had carried no such restriction.

The restaurant owner noted the asymmetry in a public statement published the same day.

When the original issue was raised, the public could see it, react, share it, and discuss it. But when it came to the correction and apology, why was the public not given the same space?

The comments that did appear under the apology were largely supportive of the page.

None were from the restaurant.

The Post Came Down, The Donation Request Went Up

Within the comment section of a separate post, Halal inquiry Company direktori published a Maybank account number and a DuitNow QR code under the name Abang Ameen Channel.

The accompanying text described the funds as “sumbangan ikhlas” — sincere contributions — toward the cost of purchasing SSM company data, so that more businesses could be investigated.

The restaurant owner’s public statement identified the sequence directly.

Viral the issue. Trigger conflict. Get traffic. Then ask for donations.

The statement noted that no direct accusation of motive was being made.

It described the pattern as a question, not a conclusion.

Ninety-Five Years

Nan Yang Coffee Shop published its own official statement on 8 August 2026.

The statement confirmed the restaurant does not sell pork and does not use lard. It confirmed the restaurant does not hold a JAKIM halal certification and has never claimed to.

It confirmed that Mee Pok is a Teochew dialect term for flat noodles.

The statement closed with a warning that legal action remained an option.

The restaurant’s Facebook page had 986 followers at the time of publication.

The page that posted the accusation had 297,000.

Pork And Pok, The Public Had Thoughts

Public response in the comment sections of both pages ran largely in one direction.

Several commenters noted that the responsibility for verifying halal status rests with Muslim consumers, not with non-Muslim operators who have never claimed certification.

One commenter wrote: “Kedai ini tak mohon sijil halal pun tak salah. Ikut suka dia sebab tak paksa pelanggan Islam datang.” The shop never applied for a halal certificate. That is not wrong. It never forced Muslim customers to come.

Another wrote: “Pork and pok pun tak dapat beza.” Cannot even tell the difference between pork and pok.

A third offered a list.

Mee Pok, Kari Pap, Popcorn, Pocky, Keropok.

All contain the syllable, none contain pork.

Halal inquiry Company direktori has not responded publicly to the police report or the MCMC complaint.

The screenshots remain.

For a page built on holding businesses accountable, questions about its own accuracy are not new.

READ MORE: [Watch] Malaysian TikToker Tells Muslims They Can’t Eat At Singapore McDonald’s, Which Has Been Halal Since 1992

READ MORE: Firdaus Wong Compares KL Fashion Week To Convicted Sex Trafficker Jeffrey Epstein

READ MORE: [Watch] Chinese Muslim Convert vs. Podcast Host: “Haram” Or Harm? The Temple Language Dividing Malaysia

READ MORE: [Watch] Preacher Firdaus Wong Criticised Over “Non-Muslims Using BM For Social Media Content” Post

Share your thoughts with us via TRP’s Facebook, X, Instagram, or Threads.

...