Beyond apologies: Why Najib's words ring hollow in modern Malaysia
7 days ago
Convicted felon Najib Razak’s purported ‘apology’ raises some interesting points.
It prompts us to ask: what are the core values of Umno or, for that matter, Barisan Nasional?
If Umno members were clear about this, they would have a different perspective on Najib’s so-called apology. That they still lack this clarity is precisely the reason they continue to support a corrupt “Bossku” (my boss).
Yet, religion and prayers are not necessarily an antidote to greed, lust and hatred.
If religion does not inspire an internal sense of realisation and change, then it remains mere belief. And it takes more than mere belief to transform one’s life.
Moral and ethical standards are critical. Indeed, we have today too many believers who have lost their inner moral compass.
Without clarity in this regard, the various political parties will have varying perspectives.
If politicians are not clear about their personal core values and the values that their political parties stand for, then the prevailing mindset would be: “It’s OK, everyone does it.”
This legitimises a culture of dishonesty and the lack of integrity and clarity. Just consider the BN elite in this context.
The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission has a difficult job. Just as fish rots from the head, this culture, which prevailed during the BN years in power, has infected the civil service, customs, immigration, the police and even the MACC to some extent.
The combination of self-interest and power leads to corruption – a serious challenge for any government. This is not uncommon, as we see in former South African President Jacob Zuma, who also fell foul of the law. Several South Korean leaders have had to resign.
Clearly, this is not an issue of race but of human weaknesses, arising out of a lack of an inner moral compass.
We have all read about the recent events in Singapore surrounding the republic’s former transport minister, S Iswaran.
The judge in his ruling said that there was a higher level of culpability when a public servant holds high office that wields greater influence over business transactions.
This was the case regarding a man who held cabinet positions in the Singapore government for 13 years.
Najib, for his part, has held public office positions over several decades. Surely, he should have known better!
Having a personal moral compass is crucial. Religion must inspire this, and ethical leadership then follows. Even if you are unclear about your personal moral compass, the core values of the organisation you belong can guide you. Failing this, you become vulnerable to motivations of greed and power.
Clear ethical standards hold each of us to a level of conduct that is acceptable in the interest of the larger good.
So if you choose to become a politician and enter the public sphere, then you need to embrace public accountability.
And is it then inappropriate for the people to expect exemplary conduct and accountability from you? Their duty is to hold you to this higher standard.
The higher you go, the greater the fall. No amount of blaming others can justify Najib’s actions. Court cases have exposed to the public the many instances of dishonesty, scheming and cover-ups.
Now we have eminent people supporting his apology. But an apology is good only when it comes immediately after you have has committed a wrong. If you don’t realize this and have already been declared guilty, all that’s left is a superficial apology, blaming others and playing the victim card.
What are those who are supporting his apology saying? Are they also confirming that you do not need core values and ethical standards?
A government that emphasises transparency, accountability and good governance has to state its clear stand.
If Malaysia “Madani” (a civil and compassionate Malaysia) talks about the creation of a civilised, skilled and inclusive society stressing on sustainability, innovation and prosperity based on fundamental values of respect, trust and compassion, then what does all this mean?
These are not mere words to be uttered. Rather, we, the people, will hold leaders to these standards. They have to act on these words and integrate these values into their policymaking.
Does Najib’s apology build trust? He has lost his credibility and no amount of blame and victimhood is going to cleanse, other than his time in prison. Where does respect come when you have already been found guilty by so many judges and have lost the respect of the people?
Compassion represents our regard for the other. Yet, the scale of Najib’s guilt and the numerous scandals that plagued his leadership does not inspire any compassion.
Unless Umno and BN can tell us their core values and what guides them in serving the people, many are unlikely to vote for them. We need to hear a difference in tone and cause beyond race. But neither the MCA nor the MIC helps them in becoming different because they face similar challenges.
Respect for the nation and its global image have been severely damaged. Those travelling abroad in recent years have often faced the question, “What’s happening in your country?”
Indeed, political expediency at the expense of the rule of law will have far-reaching, long-term consequences for the nation.
If all this and the BN’s debacle in the 2022 general election is not enough of a wake-up call, then the coalition can look forward to a quiet demise – unless it comes out with an inclusive agenda, clear core values and a direction that takes Malaysia forward and onwards.
But the critical question remains: does the BN have the ethical leadership required to make such a difference?
...Read the fullstory
It's better on the More. News app
✅ It’s fast
✅ It’s easy to use
✅ It’s free