What The iPhone’s Made Of: A Thoughtful Look At Apple’s Changing Materials

Subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest stories and updates.

As someone who has used iPhones for most of my life, I’ve grown used to how each model feels in the hand — the texture, the edges, the way heat moves through it. Apple’s shift in materials tells its own story. Over the years, the company has cycled through aluminium, stainless steel, titanium, and now returned to aluminium. Each step seems to weigh different priorities such as strength, polish, comfort, or practicality.

A Short History of Apple’s Material Choices

The early iPhones relied on aluminium and glass — light, durable, and easy to machine. It gave the phones a minimal, almost tool-like quality. With the Pro line, Apple turned to stainless steel, a metal that looked premium but came at the cost of added weight and trapped heat.

Titanium arrived as something new — stronger than steel, lighter in hand, and distinctly matte. But it wasn’t perfect. It offered resilience, yes, yet it retained warmth longer and showed wear differently. Its complexity in production also made it harder to scale.

Now, with the iPhone 17 series, Apple has largely returned to aluminium. The standard and Pro models use an aluminium frame with glass, while the iPhone 17 Air keeps titanium. According to Apple, the switch improves heat dissipation and supports their sustainability goals by using up to 85% recycled aluminium.

What Matters in Daily Use

Every metal changes how a phone lives day to day.

Heat management

Aluminium conducts heat better than titanium or steel. In prolonged use — gaming, photography, or charging — it keeps internal components from warming up as quickly. That doesn’t mean it stays cool, but it disperses heat more evenly, reducing throttling.

Durability

Stainless steel resists bending and dents, titanium shrugs off scratches, while aluminium shows wear sooner, especially around edges. Still, most surface marks are cosmetic. Some early iPhone 17 owners have noticed “scratchgate” along the camera bump — mostly chipping in the anodised layer rather than deep damage. It’s a trade-off between aesthetic longevity and thermal stability.

Weight and handling

Aluminium feels lighter and more balanced. Steel looks expensive but can tire the wrist. Titanium is strong and light but not significantly more so than Apple’s current aluminium alloy.

Sustainability

Aluminium is easier to recycle, and Apple has leaned into that. Titanium, while durable, is energy-intensive to refine. Returning to aluminium allows Apple to reduce waste and cost without losing much strength.

What I Think After Years of Use

Titanium had novelty value, but in practice, it didn’t change how the phone worked. Aluminium feels like Apple returning to what makes sense: a balance between heat, weight, and real-world handling. It’s not the toughest material, but perhaps it doesn’t need to be.

We often treat durability as an absolute, when it’s actually about context. A phone that resists scratches but overheats isn’t better; it’s just different. If you want something that feels premium, titanium remains the aesthetic winner. If you want something that performs steadily and feels lighter, aluminium is more practical.

...