Cookies Keep the Internet Running, But They Also Keep Tabs on You

Subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest stories and updates.

We’ve all done it — clicked “Accept All” just to move past a pop-up and get on with what we came for. It has become a reflex, a quiet ritual of browsing. Every page asks for our consent, and most of us give it without thinking. But should we?

Cookies were once tiny text files that helped websites remember you. They made the internet feel personal, recalling your cart, your settings, or your login. It was convenience, not surveillance. Yet as the web evolved, so did the cookie. What began as a shortcut to smoother browsing slowly turned into a quiet system of tracking, profiling, and prediction.

From Memory to Monitoring

Modern cookies do more than remember your preferences. Many follow you across pages, mapping what you click, how long you linger, and what you are likely to do next. They turn behaviour into data, and data into value. It’s how ads seem to know what you were just looking at.

In exchange for speed and personalisation, we hand over fragments of ourselves — our habits, our curiosity, even our hesitation. The convenience feels harmless, but it builds a profile far richer than most realise.

So, should we accept them? That depends on what we value more. Is it efficiency or privacy? Cookies make the web smoother, but they also make us more visible.

The Illusion of Consent

Those cookie banners we see on nearly every page are meant to protect our privacy. Yet most are designed to steer us towards “Accept All”. It is not real choice. It is a soft push disguised as design.

And when we say yes out of impatience or habit, it says something about more than our online behaviour. It reflects how easily convenience replaces caution, and how quietly we surrender privacy for simplicity.

The Question We Rarely Ask

Cookies keep the web running. They make browsing seamless and personal. But they also keep tabs on us, often long after we have closed the page.

So, should we accept them? Perhaps the better question is whether we truly understand what happens when we do. Because if convenience always wins, privacy never stood a chance.