[Watch] Red Card At 20-20: A BWF Time-Clock Trial Cost Malaysia A Place In The Indonesia Open Semis

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter, or Telegram and WhatsApp channels for the latest stories and updates.

It was not a smash that ended Malaysia’s campaign at the Indonesia Open.

It was a red card.

At 20-20 in the deciding game of their quarter-final on Friday (5 June), mixed doubles pair Goh Soon Huat and Lai Shevon Jemie saw a point transferred directly to their French opponents — Thom Gicquel and Delphine Delrue — after Soon Huat was penalised for time delay under the Badminton World Federation’s (BWF) 25-second time clock system.

France won the next point to seal the match 21-15, 18-21, 22-20.

The husband and wife pair did not dispute the existence of the rule; what they disputed was its application — and the moment it was applied.

A Rule Still Being Tested

The BWF’s 25-second time clock, which requires the server to be ready before the clock expires between rallies, is explicitly still in a trial phase.

The system was first tested at the Indonesia Masters in January 2026, with the BWF stating that “enforcement will be mainly limited to verbal warnings” during initial trials.

It was subsequently extended to the Indonesia Open 2026, held from June 2 to 7 at Istora Senayan in Jakarta, where the BWF confirmed the system would be “in effect for all matches, with full enforcement by umpires as per regulations.”

That shift — from verbal warnings to full enforcement — sits at the heart of the controversy.

What Happened On Court

According to a statement posted on social media by Shevon, Soon Huat had earlier received a yellow card in the match after briefly leaving the court to retrieve grip powder, as his racket handle had become slippery.

He did not immediately return upon the umpire’s instruction — not, Shevon said, out of defiance, but because Istora Senayan’s famously loud crowd made it impossible to hear the call.

The red card came later, at the match’s most critical juncture.

At 20-20 in the third game, with the French pair taking time to prepare for their serve, Soon Huat briefly turned to communicate with Shevon.

By the time he returned to his position — which Shevon said was “well before the next point started” — the umpire issued a red card.

Under BWF regulations, a red card for a continuous or significant breach results in a point being awarded to the opposing side.

The French pair were handed a match point at 21-20, and they converted it.

Within The Rules — But Was It Within Reason?

On the strict letter of the law, the umpire was acting within her full, sanctioned authority — BWF’s Laws of Badminton permit red cards for repeated breaches, and the Indonesia Open was confirmed to operate under “full enforcement” of the time-clock trial.

A red card following an earlier yellow card is also consistent with BWF’s graduated misconduct framework.

But the question Soon Huat and Shevon are raising is a different one entirely.

Shevon’s statement was careful not to attack the umpire or the BWF — instead, it challenged the structural logic of applying match-deciding punitive consequences under a rule not yet fully established.

She also flagged a second gap: unlike tennis, which has electronic line-call reviews, or cricket’s Decision Review System, badminton offers players no on-court mechanism to contest umpiring decisions — leaving them, as she wrote, “forced not only to compete against their opponents, but also to deal with questionable rulings and the psychological impact that comes with them.”

The red card, issued by Indonesian umpire Helen Purnama Sari, has since ignited a firestorm among Malaysian fans — a reaction sharpened by the long-running badminton rivalry between the two nations.

The Consistency Question

Perhaps the most pointed detail in Shevon’s account was the context she provided for the red card moment.

The French pair, she noted, had been “taking their time to prepare for the next serve — as they had been doing throughout the match.”

Despite the defeat, Soon Huai and Shevon remain in contention for the season-ending BWF World Tour Finals, where qualification is determined by accumulated ranking points.

The BWF has not indicated whether the time clock trial will be reviewed following the Indonesia Open.

The system is expected to continue at select tournaments through the remainder of the 2026 season.

For now, the pair’s exit from Jakarta leaves behind a question that extends well beyond one match: when does a trial become a verdict?

The Malaysian pair were not alone: Thailand’s Dechapol Puavaranukroh also received a yellow card for an alleged time delay at the same tournament, with observers noting that the umpire had flagged him despite his opponents not yet being ready to receive — suggesting the enforcement inconsistency extended beyond a single match.

Share your thoughts with us via TRP’s Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Threads.

...